HR Practice For Payroll Practitioners

HR Practice for Payroll Practitioners

Different graphical styles

When developing an actual form keep the format simple and easy to follow. Anything more than three pages and it will become more of a burden than a resource. In the area below there is a range of examples of graphical rating scales. For each scale a section for comments should be added. It is also advisable that managers should justify their ratings with specific examples.

✓

(a)

High

Low

Quality

✓

(b)

Low

Quality

High

1

2

3

4

5

✓

(c)

Quality

Exceptionall y high quality workmanshi

Work usually done in superior way

Quality is average for the job

Work contains frequent flaws

Work is seldom satisfactory

✓

(d)

Quality

Too many errors

Occasional errors

Almost never makes mistakes

About average

(e)

Quality

5

4

3

2

1

Performance Grade

Performance Factors

Consistently Superior

Sometimes Superior

Consistently Average

Consistently Unsatisfactory

(f)

Quality

Quality:

Accuracy Economy Neatness

X

1

2

3

4

5 6

7

8

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 X

(g)

Quality

Poor

Below Average

Average

Above Average

Excellent

(h)

15

13

11

9

7

5

3

1

Quality of Work

Rejects and errors consistently rare

Work usually okay; error seldom made

Work passable; needs to be checked often

Frequent errors and scrap; careless

Judge amount of scrap; consider general care and accuracy of Also consider inspection report. Poor, 1-6; Average, 7-18; Good, 19-25

20

© New Zealand Payroll Practitioners Association, Sep 2024, Ver 12

107